File name: Pandora207s1_ArlingtonTX_20231117_L2Fit_fsus1c4d20221007p1-8.txt
File generation date: 20240213T150728.2Z
Data description: Level 2 spectral fitting results file
Data file version: fsus1c4p1-8
Local principal investigator: Yang Li
Network principal investigator: Alexander Cede
Instrument type: Pandora
Instrument number: 207
Spectrometer number: 1
Processing software version used: BlickP v1.8.59
Instrument operation file used: Pandora207_OF_v5d20210722.txt
Instrument calibration file used: Pandora207s1_CF_v4d20221007.txt
Level 1 file used: Pandora207s1_ArlingtonTX_20231117_L1_smca1c4d20221007p1-8.txt
Full location name: University Of Texas, Arlington Science Hall
Short location name: ArlingtonTX
Country of location: United States
Location latitude [deg]: 32.7316
Location longitude [deg]: -97.1142
Location altitude [m]: 15
Local noon date: 20231117
Notes on s-number (L1 configuration): Corrections NOT applied although requested by the s-number are dark map for dark correction (replaced by immediate dark method), latency correction, matrix method stray light correction (replaced by simple method)
Data caveats: None
First and last pixel inside fitting window: 207 351
Nominal wavelengths inside fitting window [nm]: 306.0609 306.2023 306.3438 306.4852 306.6266 306.7680 306.9093 307.0507 307.1920 307.3334 307.4747 307.6160 307.7573 307.8986 308.0399 308.1811 308.3224 308.4636 308.6049 308.7461 308.8873 309.0285 309.1696 309.3108 309.4520 309.5931 309.7342 309.8753 310.0164 310.1575 310.2986 310.4397 310.5807 310.7218 310.8628 311.0038 311.1448 311.2858 311.4268 311.5678 311.7087 311.8497 311.9906 312.1315 312.2724 312.4133 312.5542 312.6951 312.8359 312.9768 313.1176 313.2584 313.3992 313.5400 313.6808 313.8216 313.9623 314.1031 314.2438 314.3845 314.5252 314.6659 314.8066 314.9473 315.0879 315.2286 315.3692 315.5098 315.6505 315.7910 315.9316 316.0722 316.2128 316.3533 316.4938 316.6344 316.7749 316.9154 317.0558 317.1963 317.3368 317.4772 317.6177 317.7581 317.8985 318.0389 318.1793 318.3196 318.4600 318.6003 318.7407 318.8810 319.0213 319.1616 319.3019 319.4421 319.5824 319.7226 319.8628 320.0031 320.1433 320.2835 320.4236 320.5638 320.7040 320.8441 320.9842 321.1243 321.2644 321.4045 321.5446 321.6847 321.8247 321.9647 322.1048 322.2448 322.3848 322.5247 322.6647 322.8047 322.9446 323.0846 323.2245 323.3644 323.5043 323.6442 323.7840 323.9239 324.0637 324.2036 324.3434 324.4832 324.6230 324.7628 324.9025 325.0423 325.1820 325.3218 325.4615 325.6012 325.7409 325.8805 326.0202 326.1599 326.2995
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 1: Two letter code of measurement routine
Column 2: UT date and time for center-time of measurement, yyyymmddThhmmssZ (ISO 8601)
Column 3: Fractional days since 1-Jan-2000 midnight for center-time of measurement
Column 4: Routine count (1 for the first routine of the day, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 5: Repetition count (1 for the first set in the routine, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 6: Total duration of measurement set in seconds
Column 7: Data processing type index
Column 8: Solar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 9: Solar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 10: Lunar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 11: Lunar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 12: Pointing zenith angle in degree, absolute or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 13: Zenith pointing mode: zenith angle is... 0=absolute, 1=relative to sun, 2=relative to moon
Column 14: Pointing azimuth in degree, increases clockwise, absolute (0=north) or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 15: Azimuth pointing mode: like zenith angle mode but also fixed scattering angles relative to sun (3) or moon (4)
Column 16: Fitting result index: 0=no error or warning, 1, 2=warning, >2=error
Column 17: Number of function evaluations used, 0=linear fitting or fitting not successful or no fitting done
Column 18: rms of unweighted fitting residuals, -9=fitting not successful
Column 19: Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty used
Column 20: Expected rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 21: Expected normalized weighted rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 22: Bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 23: Independent uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 24: Structured uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 25: Common uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 26: rms-based uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 27: Bromine oxide effective temperature [K]
Column 28: Independent uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 29: Structured uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 30: Common uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 31: Effective bromine oxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 32: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for bromine oxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 33: Formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 34: Independent uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 35: Structured uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 36: Common uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 37: rms-based uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 38: Formaldehyde effective temperature [K]
Column 39: Independent uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 40: Structured uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 41: Common uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 42: Effective formaldehyde fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 43: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for formaldehyde [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 44: Nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 45: Independent uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 46: Structured uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 47: Common uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 48: rms-based uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 49: Nitrous acid effective temperature [K]
Column 50: Independent uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 51: Structured uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 52: Common uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 53: Effective nitrous acid fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 54: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for nitrous acid [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 55: Nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 56: Independent uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 57: Structured uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 58: Common uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 59: rms-based uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 60: Nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 61: Independent uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 62: Structured uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 63: Common uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 64: Effective nitrogen dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 65: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for nitrogen dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 66: Ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 67: Independent uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 68: Structured uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 69: Common uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 70: rms-based uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 71: Ozone effective temperature [K]
Column 72: Independent uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 73: Structured uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 74: Common uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 75: rms-based uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 76: Effective ozone fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 77: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for ozone [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 78: Sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 79: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 80: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 81: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 82: rms-based uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 83: Sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 84: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 85: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 86: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 87: Effective sulfur dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 88: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for sulfur dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 89: Molecular scattering air mass factor used for molecular scattering subtraction before the fitting
Column 90: Estimated uncertainty of molecular scattering air mass factor, -9=molecular scattering was not subtracted before the fitting
Column 91: Lower limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 92: Upper limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 93: Order of smoothing polynomial
Column 94: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 95: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 96: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 97: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 98: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 99: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1
Column 100: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 101: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 102: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 103: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 104: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2
Column 105: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 106: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 107: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 108: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 109: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3
Column 110: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 111: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 112: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 113: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 114: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4
Column 115: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 116: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 117: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 118: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 119: Mean value of measured data inside fitting window [same units as measurements]
Column 120: Offset polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 121: Independent uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 122: Structured uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 123: Common uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 124: rms-based uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 125: Wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 126: Independent uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 127: Structured uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 128: Common uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 129: rms-based uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 130: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 0, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 131: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 1, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 132: Resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 133: Independent uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 134: Structured uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 135: Common uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 136: rms-based uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 137: L2Fit data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 138: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=L1 data quality above 0, 1=Spectral fitting was not successful, 2=Wavelength shift too large, 3=Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty too large
Column 139: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 140: L1 data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 141: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=Saturated data, 1=Too few dark counts measurements, 2=No temperature given or effective temperature too different from the reference temperature, 3=Dark count too high, 4=Unsuccessful dark background fitting, 5=The dark count differs significantly from the dark map for too many pixels, 6=Absolute value of estimated average residual stray light level too high, 7=Although attempted, no wavelength change could be retrieved, 8=Absolute value of retrieved wavelength shift too large, 9=Retrieved wavelength shift differs too much from the shift predicted by the effective temperature
Column 142: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 143: Atmospheric variability [%], 999=no atmospheric variability was determined
Column 144: Wavelength effective temperature [°C], 999=no effective temperature given
Column 145: Estimated average residual stray light level [%] (only valid for stray light correction methods 2 and higher)
Column 146: Retrieved wavelength shift from L1 data [nm], -9=no wavelength change determination
Column 147: Retrieved total wavelength shift [nm], -9=no wavelength change fitting
Column 148: Number of bright count cycles
Column 149: Number of dark count cycles
Column 150: Effective position of filterwheel #1, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 151: Effective position of filterwheel #2, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 152: Sum over 2^i, 0=spectra were interpolated in time, 1=spectra are corrected for off-target signal
Column 153: Integration time [ms]
Column 154: Spectrometer control temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 155: Auxiliary spectrometer temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 156: Temperature in head sensor [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 157: Temperature at electronics board 1 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 158: Temperature at electronics board 2 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 159: Humidity in head sensor [%], -9=no humidity signal
Column 160: Pressure in head sensor [hPa], -9=no pressure signal
Columns 161-305: Unweighted slant column residuals for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting
Columns 306-450: Normalized slant column residuals weighted with independent instrumental uncertainty for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting, 0=no independent instrumental uncertainty was given
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------