File name: Pandora230s1_Gongju-KNU_20230711_L2Fit_fout2c3d20221031p1-8.txt
File generation date: 20250224T160550.0Z
Data description: Level 2 spectral fitting results file
Data file version: fout2c3p1-8
Local principal investigator: Hyunkee Hong
Network principal investigator: Alexander Cede
Instrument type: Pandora
Instrument number: 230
Spectrometer number: 1
Processing software version used: BlickP v1.8.74
Instrument operation file used: Pandora230_OF_v3d20220711.txt
Instrument calibration file used: Pandora230s1_CF_v3d20221031.txt
Level 1 file used: Pandora230s1_Gongju-KNU_20230711_L1_smca1c3d20221031p1-8.txt
Full location name: Kongju National University, Gongju Campus
Short location name: Gongju-KNU
Country of location: Korea, Republic of
Location latitude [deg]: 36.4710
Location longitude [deg]: 127.1450
Location altitude [m]: 64
Local noon date: 20230711
Notes on s-number (L1 configuration): Corrections NOT applied although requested by the s-number are dark map for dark correction (replaced by immediate dark method), latency correction, matrix method stray light correction (replaced by simple method)
Data caveats: New OoB session to fix CF generated in session2
First and last pixel inside fitting window: 198 339
Nominal wavelengths inside fitting window [nm]: 305.1145 305.2557 305.3970 305.5382 305.6794 305.8206 305.9618 306.1030 306.2441 306.3853 306.5264 306.6675 306.8087 306.9498 307.0909 307.2320 307.3730 307.5141 307.6552 307.7962 307.9372 308.0783 308.2193 308.3603 308.5012 308.6422 308.7832 308.9241 309.0651 309.2060 309.3469 309.4878 309.6287 309.7696 309.9105 310.0514 310.1922 310.3331 310.4739 310.6147 310.7555 310.8963 311.0371 311.1779 311.3187 311.4594 311.6001 311.7409 311.8816 312.0223 312.1630 312.3037 312.4444 312.5850 312.7257 312.8663 313.0069 313.1476 313.2882 313.4288 313.5693 313.7099 313.8505 313.9910 314.1316 314.2721 314.4126 314.5531 314.6936 314.8341 314.9746 315.1150 315.2555 315.3959 315.5363 315.6767 315.8172 315.9575 316.0979 316.2383 316.3786 316.5190 316.6593 316.7997 316.9400 317.0803 317.2206 317.3608 317.5011 317.6414 317.7816 317.9218 318.0621 318.2023 318.3425 318.4826 318.6228 318.7630 318.9031 319.0433 319.1834 319.3235 319.4636 319.6037 319.7438 319.8839 320.0239 320.1640 320.3040 320.4441 320.5841 320.7241 320.8641 321.0040 321.1440 321.2840 321.4239 321.5639 321.7038 321.8437 321.9836 322.1235 322.2634 322.4032 322.5431 322.6829 322.8228 322.9626 323.1024 323.2422 323.3820 323.5217 323.6615 323.8012 323.9410 324.0807 324.2204 324.3601 324.4998 324.6395 324.7792 324.9188
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 1: Two letter code of measurement routine
Column 2: UT date and time for center-time of measurement, yyyymmddThhmmssZ (ISO 8601)
Column 3: Fractional days since 1-Jan-2000 midnight for center-time of measurement
Column 4: Routine count (1 for the first routine of the day, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 5: Repetition count (1 for the first set in the routine, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 6: Total duration of measurement set in seconds
Column 7: Data processing type index
Column 8: Solar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 9: Solar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 10: Lunar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 11: Lunar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 12: Pointing zenith angle in degree, absolute or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 13: Zenith pointing mode: zenith angle is... 0=absolute, 1=relative to sun, 2=relative to moon
Column 14: Pointing azimuth in degree, increases clockwise, absolute (0=north) or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 15: Azimuth pointing mode: like zenith angle mode but also fixed scattering angles relative to sun (3) or moon (4)
Column 16: Fitting result index: 0=no error or warning, 1, 2=warning, >2=error
Column 17: Number of function evaluations used, 0=linear fitting or fitting not successful or no fitting done
Column 18: rms of unweighted fitting residuals, -9=fitting not successful
Column 19: Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty used
Column 20: Expected rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 21: Expected normalized weighted rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 22: Ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 23: Independent uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 24: Structured uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 25: Common uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 26: rms-based uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 27: Ozone effective temperature [K]
Column 28: Independent uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 29: Structured uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 30: Common uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 31: Effective ozone fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 32: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for ozone [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 33: Sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 34: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 35: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 36: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 37: rms-based uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 38: Sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 39: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 40: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 41: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 42: Effective sulfur dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 43: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for sulfur dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 44: Molecular scattering air mass factor used for molecular scattering subtraction before the fitting
Column 45: Estimated uncertainty of molecular scattering air mass factor, -9=molecular scattering was not subtracted before the fitting
Column 46: Lower limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 47: Upper limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 48: Order of smoothing polynomial
Column 49: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 50: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 51: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 52: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 53: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 54: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1
Column 55: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 56: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 57: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 58: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 59: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2
Column 60: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 61: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 62: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 63: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 64: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3
Column 65: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 66: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 67: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 68: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 69: Mean value of measured data inside fitting window [same units as measurements]
Column 70: Wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 71: Independent uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 72: Structured uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 73: Common uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 74: rms-based uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 75: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 0, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 76: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 1, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 77: L2Fit data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 78: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=L1 data quality above 0, 1=Spectral fitting was not successful, 2=Wavelength shift too large, 3=Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty too large
Column 79: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 80: L1 data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 81: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=Saturated data, 1=Too few dark counts measurements, 2=No temperature given or effective temperature too different from the reference temperature, 3=Dark count too high, 4=Unsuccessful dark background fitting, 5=The dark count differs significantly from the dark map for too many pixels, 6=Absolute value of estimated average residual stray light level too high, 7=Although attempted, no wavelength change could be retrieved, 8=Absolute value of retrieved wavelength shift too large, 9=Retrieved wavelength shift differs too much from the shift predicted by the effective temperature
Column 82: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 83: Atmospheric variability [%], 999=no atmospheric variability was determined
Column 84: Wavelength effective temperature [°C], 999=no effective temperature given
Column 85: Estimated average residual stray light level [%] (only valid for stray light correction methods 2 and higher)
Column 86: Retrieved wavelength shift from L1 data [nm], -9=no wavelength change determination
Column 87: Retrieved total wavelength shift [nm], -9=no wavelength change fitting
Column 88: Number of bright count cycles
Column 89: Number of dark count cycles
Column 90: Effective position of filterwheel #1, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 91: Effective position of filterwheel #2, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 92: Sum over 2^i, 0=spectra were interpolated in time, 1=spectra are corrected for off-target signal
Column 93: Integration time [ms]
Column 94: Spectrometer control temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 95: Auxiliary spectrometer temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 96: Temperature in head sensor [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 97: Temperature at electronics board 1 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 98: Temperature at electronics board 2 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 99: Humidity in head sensor [%], -9=no humidity signal
Column 100: Pressure in head sensor [hPa], -9=no pressure signal
Columns 101-242: Unweighted slant column residuals for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting
Columns 243-384: Normalized slant column residuals weighted with independent instrumental uncertainty for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting, 0=no independent instrumental uncertainty was given
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------