File name: Pandora241s1_Jeonju_20241015_L2Fit_fsus1c3d20241002p1-8.txt
File generation date: 20250107T151355.3Z
Data description: Level 2 spectral fitting results file
Data file version: fsus1c3p1-8
Local principal investigator: Mijung Song
Network principal investigator: Alexander Cede
Instrument type: Pandora
Instrument number: 241
Spectrometer number: 1
Processing software version used: BlickP v1.8.60
Instrument operation file used: Pandora241_OF_v2d20230410.txt
Instrument calibration file used: Pandora241s1_CF_v3d20241002.txt
Level 1 file used: Pandora241s1_Jeonju_20241015_L1_smca1c3d20241002p1-8.txt
Full location name: Jeonbuk National University/Jeonju
Short location name: Jeonju
Country of location: Korea, Republic of
Location latitude [deg]: 35.8466
Location longitude [deg]: 127.1307
Location altitude [m]: 40
Local noon date: 20241015
Notes on s-number (L1 configuration): Corrections NOT applied although requested by the s-number are dark map for dark correction (replaced by immediate dark method), latency correction, matrix method stray light correction (replaced by simple method)
Data caveats: Modification of session 2, but final AnaFld.
First and last pixel inside fitting window: 197 342
Nominal wavelengths inside fitting window [nm]: 306.0329 306.1736 306.3143 306.4549 306.5956 306.7363 306.8769 307.0176 307.1582 307.2988 307.4394 307.5800 307.7206 307.8612 308.0017 308.1423 308.2828 308.4234 308.5639 308.7044 308.8449 308.9854 309.1258 309.2663 309.4068 309.5472 309.6876 309.8281 309.9685 310.1089 310.2493 310.3896 310.5300 310.6703 310.8107 310.9510 311.0913 311.2317 311.3720 311.5122 311.6525 311.7928 311.9330 312.0733 312.2135 312.3537 312.4939 312.6341 312.7743 312.9145 313.0547 313.1948 313.3350 313.4751 313.6152 313.7553 313.8954 314.0355 314.1756 314.3156 314.4557 314.5957 314.7358 314.8758 315.0158 315.1558 315.2958 315.4358 315.5757 315.7157 315.8556 315.9955 316.1355 316.2754 316.4153 316.5551 316.6950 316.8349 316.9747 317.1146 317.2544 317.3942 317.5340 317.6738 317.8136 317.9534 318.0931 318.2329 318.3726 318.5123 318.6520 318.7917 318.9314 319.0711 319.2108 319.3504 319.4901 319.6297 319.7693 319.9089 320.0485 320.1881 320.3277 320.4673 320.6068 320.7464 320.8859 321.0254 321.1649 321.3044 321.4439 321.5834 321.7228 321.8623 322.0017 322.1411 322.2805 322.4200 322.5593 322.6987 322.8381 322.9775 323.1168 323.2561 323.3955 323.5348 323.6741 323.8134 323.9526 324.0919 324.2311 324.3704 324.5096 324.6488 324.7880 324.9272 325.0664 325.2056 325.3448 325.4839 325.6230 325.7622 325.9013 326.0404 326.1795 326.3186
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 1: Two letter code of measurement routine
Column 2: UT date and time for center-time of measurement, yyyymmddThhmmssZ (ISO 8601)
Column 3: Fractional days since 1-Jan-2000 midnight for center-time of measurement
Column 4: Routine count (1 for the first routine of the day, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 5: Repetition count (1 for the first set in the routine, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 6: Total duration of measurement set in seconds
Column 7: Data processing type index
Column 8: Solar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 9: Solar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 10: Lunar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 11: Lunar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 12: Pointing zenith angle in degree, absolute or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 13: Zenith pointing mode: zenith angle is... 0=absolute, 1=relative to sun, 2=relative to moon
Column 14: Pointing azimuth in degree, increases clockwise, absolute (0=north) or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 15: Azimuth pointing mode: like zenith angle mode but also fixed scattering angles relative to sun (3) or moon (4)
Column 16: Fitting result index: 0=no error or warning, 1, 2=warning, >2=error
Column 17: Number of function evaluations used, 0=linear fitting or fitting not successful or no fitting done
Column 18: rms of unweighted fitting residuals, -9=fitting not successful
Column 19: Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty used
Column 20: Expected rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 21: Expected normalized weighted rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 22: Bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 23: Independent uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 24: Structured uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 25: Common uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 26: rms-based uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 27: Bromine oxide effective temperature [K]
Column 28: Independent uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 29: Structured uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 30: Common uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 31: Effective bromine oxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 32: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for bromine oxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 33: Formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 34: Independent uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 35: Structured uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 36: Common uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 37: rms-based uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 38: Formaldehyde effective temperature [K]
Column 39: Independent uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 40: Structured uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 41: Common uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 42: Effective formaldehyde fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 43: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for formaldehyde [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 44: Nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 45: Independent uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 46: Structured uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 47: Common uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 48: rms-based uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 49: Nitrous acid effective temperature [K]
Column 50: Independent uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 51: Structured uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 52: Common uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 53: Effective nitrous acid fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 54: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for nitrous acid [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 55: Nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 56: Independent uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 57: Structured uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 58: Common uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 59: rms-based uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 60: Nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 61: Independent uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 62: Structured uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 63: Common uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 64: Effective nitrogen dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 65: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for nitrogen dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 66: Ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 67: Independent uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 68: Structured uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 69: Common uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 70: rms-based uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 71: Ozone effective temperature [K]
Column 72: Independent uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 73: Structured uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 74: Common uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 75: rms-based uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 76: Effective ozone fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 77: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for ozone [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 78: Sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 79: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 80: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 81: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 82: rms-based uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 83: Sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 84: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 85: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 86: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 87: Effective sulfur dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 88: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for sulfur dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 89: Molecular scattering air mass factor used for molecular scattering subtraction before the fitting
Column 90: Estimated uncertainty of molecular scattering air mass factor, -9=molecular scattering was not subtracted before the fitting
Column 91: Lower limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 92: Upper limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 93: Order of smoothing polynomial
Column 94: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 95: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 96: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 97: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 98: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 99: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1
Column 100: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 101: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 102: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 103: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 104: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2
Column 105: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 106: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 107: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 108: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 109: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3
Column 110: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 111: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 112: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 113: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 114: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4
Column 115: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 116: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 117: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 118: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 119: Mean value of measured data inside fitting window [same units as measurements]
Column 120: Offset polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 121: Independent uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 122: Structured uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 123: Common uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 124: rms-based uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 125: Wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 126: Independent uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 127: Structured uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 128: Common uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 129: rms-based uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 130: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 0, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 131: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 1, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 132: Resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 133: Independent uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 134: Structured uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 135: Common uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 136: rms-based uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 137: L2Fit data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 138: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=L1 data quality above 0, 1=Spectral fitting was not successful, 2=Wavelength shift too large, 3=Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty too large
Column 139: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 140: L1 data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 141: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=Saturated data, 1=Too few dark counts measurements, 2=No temperature given or effective temperature too different from the reference temperature, 3=Dark count too high, 4=Unsuccessful dark background fitting, 5=The dark count differs significantly from the dark map for too many pixels, 6=Absolute value of estimated average residual stray light level too high, 7=Although attempted, no wavelength change could be retrieved, 8=Absolute value of retrieved wavelength shift too large, 9=Retrieved wavelength shift differs too much from the shift predicted by the effective temperature
Column 142: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 143: Atmospheric variability [%], 999=no atmospheric variability was determined
Column 144: Wavelength effective temperature [°C], 999=no effective temperature given
Column 145: Estimated average residual stray light level [%] (only valid for stray light correction methods 2 and higher)
Column 146: Retrieved wavelength shift from L1 data [nm], -9=no wavelength change determination
Column 147: Retrieved total wavelength shift [nm], -9=no wavelength change fitting
Column 148: Number of bright count cycles
Column 149: Number of dark count cycles
Column 150: Effective position of filterwheel #1, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 151: Effective position of filterwheel #2, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 152: Sum over 2^i, 0=spectra were interpolated in time, 1=spectra are corrected for off-target signal
Column 153: Integration time [ms]
Column 154: Spectrometer control temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 155: Auxiliary spectrometer temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 156: Temperature in head sensor [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 157: Temperature at electronics board 1 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 158: Temperature at electronics board 2 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 159: Humidity in head sensor [%], -9=no humidity signal
Column 160: Pressure in head sensor [hPa], -9=no pressure signal
Columns 161-306: Unweighted slant column residuals for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting
Columns 307-452: Normalized slant column residuals weighted with independent instrumental uncertainty for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting, 0=no independent instrumental uncertainty was given
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------