File name: Pandora167s1_KenoshaWI_20240809_L2Fit_ffus5c3d20221227p1-8.txt
File generation date: 20241017T205404.3Z
Data description: Level 2 spectral fitting results file
Data file version: ffus5c3p1-8
Local principal investigator: Lukas Valin
Network principal investigator: Alexander Cede
Instrument type: Pandora
Instrument number: 167
Spectrometer number: 1
Processing software version used: BlickP v1.8.60
Instrument operation file used: Pandora167_OF_v3d20221026.txt
Instrument calibration file used: Pandora167s1_CF_v3d20221227.txt
Level 1 file used: Pandora167s1_KenoshaWI_20240809_L1_smca1c3d20221227p1-8.txt
Full location name: Chiwaukee Prairie WDNR
Short location name: KenoshaWI
Country of location: United States
Location latitude [deg]: 42.5047
Location longitude [deg]: -87.8093
Location altitude [m]: 181
Local noon date: 20240809
Notes on s-number (L1 configuration): Corrections NOT applied although requested by the s-number are latency correction, matrix method stray light correction (replaced by simple method)
Data caveats: OoB session based on session 2
First and last pixel inside fitting window: 349 615
Nominal wavelengths inside fitting window [nm]: 322.5080 322.6474 322.7868 322.9262 323.0655 323.2049 323.3442 323.4835 323.6229 323.7622 323.9015 324.0407 324.1800 324.3193 324.4585 324.5977 324.7370 324.8762 325.0154 325.1546 325.2937 325.4329 325.5721 325.7112 325.8503 325.9895 326.1286 326.2677 326.4068 326.5458 326.6849 326.8240 326.9630 327.1020 327.2410 327.3801 327.5190 327.6580 327.7970 327.9360 328.0749 328.2139 328.3528 328.4917 328.6306 328.7695 328.9084 329.0472 329.1861 329.3250 329.4638 329.6026 329.7414 329.8802 330.0190 330.1578 330.2966 330.4353 330.5741 330.7128 330.8515 330.9902 331.1289 331.2676 331.4063 331.5450 331.6836 331.8223 331.9609 332.0995 332.2381 332.3767 332.5153 332.6539 332.7924 332.9310 333.0695 333.2080 333.3466 333.4851 333.6236 333.7620 333.9005 334.0390 334.1774 334.3158 334.4543 334.5927 334.7311 334.8695 335.0079 335.1462 335.2846 335.4229 335.5612 335.6996 335.8379 335.9762 336.1145 336.2527 336.3910 336.5292 336.6675 336.8057 336.9439 337.0821 337.2203 337.3585 337.4967 337.6348 337.7730 337.9111 338.0493 338.1874 338.3255 338.4636 338.6016 338.7397 338.8778 339.0158 339.1538 339.2918 339.4299 339.5679 339.7058 339.8438 339.9818 340.1197 340.2577 340.3956 340.5335 340.6714 340.8093 340.9472 341.0851 341.2229 341.3608 341.4986 341.6364 341.7742 341.9120 342.0498 342.1876 342.3254 342.4631 342.6008 342.7386 342.8763 343.0140 343.1517 343.2894 343.4271 343.5647 343.7024 343.8400 343.9776 344.1152 344.2528 344.3904 344.5280 344.6656 344.8031 344.9407 345.0782 345.2157 345.3532 345.4907 345.6282 345.7657 345.9031 346.0406 346.1780 346.3154 346.4528 346.5902 346.7276 346.8650 347.0024 347.1397 347.2771 347.4144 347.5517 347.6890 347.8263 347.9636 348.1009 348.2381 348.3754 348.5126 348.6498 348.7870 348.9242 349.0614 349.1986 349.3358 349.4729 349.6101 349.7472 349.8843 350.0214 350.1585 350.2956 350.4326 350.5697 350.7067 350.8438 350.9808 351.1178 351.2548 351.3918 351.5288 351.6657 351.8027 351.9396 352.0765 352.2134 352.3503 352.4872 352.6241 352.7610 352.8978 353.0347 353.1715 353.3083 353.4451 353.5819 353.7187 353.8554 353.9922 354.1289 354.2657 354.4024 354.5391 354.6758 354.8125 354.9491 355.0858 355.2224 355.3591 355.4957 355.6323 355.7689 355.9055 356.0421 356.1786 356.3152 356.4517 356.5882 356.7247 356.8612 356.9977 357.1342 357.2706 357.4071 357.5435 357.6800 357.8164 357.9528 358.0892 358.2255 358.3619 358.4982 358.6346 358.7709 358.9072 359.0435 359.1798
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 1: Two letter code of measurement routine
Column 2: UT date and time for center-time of measurement, yyyymmddThhmmssZ (ISO 8601)
Column 3: Fractional days since 1-Jan-2000 midnight for center-time of measurement
Column 4: Routine count (1 for the first routine of the day, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 5: Repetition count (1 for the first set in the routine, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 6: Total duration of measurement set in seconds
Column 7: Data processing type index
Column 8: Solar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 9: Solar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 10: Lunar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 11: Lunar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 12: Pointing zenith angle in degree, absolute or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 13: Zenith pointing mode: zenith angle is... 0=absolute, 1=relative to sun, 2=relative to moon
Column 14: Pointing azimuth in degree, increases clockwise, absolute (0=north) or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 15: Azimuth pointing mode: like zenith angle mode but also fixed scattering angles relative to sun (3) or moon (4)
Column 16: Fitting result index: 0=no error or warning, 1, 2=warning, >2=error
Column 17: Number of function evaluations used, 0=linear fitting or fitting not successful or no fitting done
Column 18: rms of unweighted fitting residuals, -9=fitting not successful
Column 19: Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty used
Column 20: Expected rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 21: Expected normalized weighted rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 22: Bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 23: Independent uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 24: Structured uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 25: Common uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 26: rms-based uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 27: Bromine oxide effective temperature [K]
Column 28: Independent uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 29: Structured uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 30: Common uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 31: Effective bromine oxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 32: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for bromine oxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 33: Formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 34: Independent uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 35: Structured uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 36: Common uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 37: rms-based uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 38: Formaldehyde effective temperature [K]
Column 39: Independent uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 40: Structured uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 41: Common uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 42: Effective formaldehyde fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 43: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for formaldehyde [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 44: Nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 45: Independent uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 46: Structured uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 47: Common uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 48: rms-based uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 49: Nitrous acid effective temperature [K]
Column 50: Independent uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 51: Structured uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 52: Common uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 53: Effective nitrous acid fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 54: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for nitrous acid [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 55: Nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 56: Independent uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 57: Structured uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 58: Common uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 59: rms-based uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 60: Nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 61: Independent uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 62: Structured uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 63: Common uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 64: Effective nitrogen dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 65: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for nitrogen dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 66: Oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 67: Independent uncertainty of oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 68: Structured uncertainty of oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 69: Common uncertainty of oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 70: rms-based uncertainty of oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 71: Oxygen dimer effective temperature [K]
Column 72: Independent uncertainty of oxygen dimer effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 73: Structured uncertainty of oxygen dimer effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 74: Common uncertainty of oxygen dimer effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 75: Effective oxygen dimer fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 76: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for oxygen dimer [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 77: Ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 78: Independent uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 79: Structured uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 80: Common uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 81: rms-based uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 82: Ozone effective temperature [K]
Column 83: Independent uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 84: Structured uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 85: Common uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 86: Effective ozone fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 87: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for ozone [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 88: Sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 89: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 90: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 91: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 92: rms-based uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 93: Sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 94: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 95: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 96: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 97: Effective sulfur dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 98: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for sulfur dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 99: Molecular scattering air mass factor used for molecular scattering subtraction before the fitting
Column 100: Estimated uncertainty of molecular scattering air mass factor, -9=molecular scattering was not subtracted before the fitting
Column 101: Lower limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 102: Upper limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 103: Order of smoothing polynomial
Column 104: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 105: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 106: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 107: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 108: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 109: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1
Column 110: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 111: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 112: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 113: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 114: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2
Column 115: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 116: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 117: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 118: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 119: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3
Column 120: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 121: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 122: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 123: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 124: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4
Column 125: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 126: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 127: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 128: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 129: Mean value of measured data inside fitting window [same units as measurements]
Column 130: Offset polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 131: Independent uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 132: Structured uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 133: Common uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 134: rms-based uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 135: Wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 136: Independent uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 137: Structured uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 138: Common uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 139: rms-based uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 140: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 0, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 141: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 1, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 142: Resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 143: Independent uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 144: Structured uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 145: Common uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 146: rms-based uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 147: L2Fit data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 148: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=L1 data quality above 0, 1=Spectral fitting was not successful, 2=Wavelength shift too large, 3=Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty too large
Column 149: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 150: L1 data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 151: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=Saturated data, 1=Too few dark counts measurements, 2=No temperature given or effective temperature too different from the reference temperature, 3=Dark count too high, 4=Unsuccessful dark background fitting, 5=The dark count differs significantly from the dark map for too many pixels, 6=Absolute value of estimated average residual stray light level too high, 7=Although attempted, no wavelength change could be retrieved, 8=Absolute value of retrieved wavelength shift too large, 9=Retrieved wavelength shift differs too much from the shift predicted by the effective temperature
Column 152: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 153: Atmospheric variability [%], 999=no atmospheric variability was determined
Column 154: Wavelength effective temperature [°C], 999=no effective temperature given
Column 155: Estimated average residual stray light level [%] (only valid for stray light correction methods 2 and higher)
Column 156: Retrieved wavelength shift from L1 data [nm], -9=no wavelength change determination
Column 157: Retrieved total wavelength shift [nm], -9=no wavelength change fitting
Column 158: Number of bright count cycles
Column 159: Number of dark count cycles
Column 160: Effective position of filterwheel #1, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 161: Effective position of filterwheel #2, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 162: Sum over 2^i, 0=spectra were interpolated in time, 1=spectra are corrected for off-target signal
Column 163: Integration time [ms]
Column 164: Temperature at electronics board [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 165: Spectrometer control temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 166: Auxiliary spectrometer temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 167: Temperature in head sensor [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 168: Azimuth motor temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 169: Humidity in head sensor [%], -9=no humidity signal
Column 170: Pressure in head sensor [hPa], -9=no pressure signal
Columns 171-437: Unweighted slant column residuals for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting
Columns 438-704: Normalized slant column residuals weighted with independent instrumental uncertainty for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting, 0=no independent instrumental uncertainty was given
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------